Smartphone All App’d Out?

Smartphone users in the United States spend more time using apps than ever before. On average, they spend more than 40 hours a month using their favorite apps. Meanwhile, the number of apps they use has plateaued since 2012. Research tells us that 27 is the typical number in terms of how many apps people need. Over time some apps are deleted and others added, while a core number of apps are retained indefinitely.

chartoftheday_5055_top_10_apps_in_the_world_n

Independent app developers have known about this for a while, because the average American smartphone user downloads zero apps per month. Most Smartphone users have all the apps they want or need.

Last month, the top 15 app publishers saw downloads drop an average of 20 percent in the U.S., according to research from Nomura, which relies on data from app tracker SensorTower.

Which apps do people actually use most frequently? According to SensorTower data reported by ReCode, there are few surprises when it comes to the most popular apps in the world. Big players such as Google, Facebook and Twitter dominated global app downloads in May, with Facebook owning four of the five most-downloaded apps in the world.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Social Media, Strategy, Technology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Smartphone All App’d Out?

LinkedIn – Falls to Microsoft

On Monday June 13th, Microsoft said that it would acquire LinkedIn in a $26.2 billion cash deal. The acquisition, by far the largest in Microsoft’s history, unites two companies in different businesses: one a huge developer of software tools, the other the largest business-oriented social networking site, with 433 million members globally.

Back in February 2016, LinkedIn’s stock price fell more than 40 percent after it forecast weaker-than-expected growth for the year. The share price had been close to $225 at the beginning of 2016; a month later it fell to almost $100.

Linkedin Stock Falls to Almost $100

This rapid devaluation has was a problem for more than just investors. LinkedIn’s employees are paid largely in stock, and therein lies the problem. Inside Linkedin’s new 26-story skyscraper in downtown San Francisco, as well as the corporate HQ in Mountain View, Calif., there have been persistent rumors about whether LinkedIn could retain its top talent as the marketplace diluted their income.

Among Silicon Valley companies, “LinkedIn is among the most aggressive in using share-based compensation — there is no question about that,” Mark Mahaney, a veteran technology analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in an interview on Monday. “If the stock had stayed down, it would have seen employee churn.”

Microsoft, which includes stock-based compensation in its non-GAAP earnings calculation, made a point on Monday of saying that the combined company would follow Microsoft’s practice. In other words, from now on, LinkedIn employees will no longer enjoy results that looked rosier because their stock-based compensation was not included.

Linkedinmsoft

The deal is Microsoft’s biggest gamble yet that the traditional software business is shifting quickly to cloud computing, a model in which customers rent software and other services delivered via the internet. While LinkedIn does not have the household name of Facebook, a much larger and more lucrative social network, it is the most widely used site for people to advertise and promote their professional skills and career achievements.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in General, Strategy | Tagged , | Comments Off on LinkedIn – Falls to Microsoft

Ghosts in the Machine

Facebook has roughly 1.5 billion users, according to the Digital Beyond, an online legacy planning company, tens of millions of those Facebook users are already dead. Often when people die, their friends turn their Facebook profiles into memorials, digital profiles that friends and family can revisit in remembrance of their life. At some point in the not too distant future, there will be more dead Facebook users than living ones.

You can inform Facebook in advance whether you’d like to have your account memorialized or permanently deleted from Facebook when you die. “Memorialized accounts” are a place for friends and family to gather and share memories after a person has passed away. Memorialized accounts have certain features for example the word “Remembering” will be shown next to the person’s name on their profile.

Hachem Sadikki,  Ph.D. candidate in statistics at University of Massachusetts, crunched the numbers and found that dead users on Facebook will surpass the number of living users in the year 2098. This forecast includes some assumptions about the future growth of Facebook and mortality rates. The trend away from Facebook by younger users to alternative social sites will bring the crossover date forward.

The Future of Facebook?

Of course others have already launched companies based on this fact of life. In the past few years, Eterni.me, launched in 2014, promises to create a digital version of “you” that will live on after your death. Death is certain, admits Eterni.me — but what if we could live forever as a digital avatar, “and people in the future could actually interact with your memories, stories and ideas, almost as if they were talking to you?”

If programs like Eterni.me succeed, not only will our grandchildren be able to study grandma’s memorialized Facebook they will also be able to ask Grandma’s avatar questions and receive answers which reflect her past behavior and beliefs.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Consumer Behaviour, Public Relations, Strategy | Tagged | Comments Off on Ghosts in the Machine

When Worlds Collide!

Snapchat Inc. the startup famous for delivering social media content that self-deletes has recently raised more than $1.8 billion from an investment round that took more than 12 months to complete. Several new investors, including Sequoia Capital, Spark Capital, Meritech Capital Partners and Dragoneer Investment Group participated in the funding, which values Snapchat at close to $18 billion.

According to the Wall Street Journal venture firms such as Sequoia and Spark rarely make an initial investment in a tech company so highly valued, a sign that they believe Snapchat could over time rival social-networking giant Facebook Inc., which has a market capitalization of roughly $342 billion.

Snapchat’s willingness to extend the latest funding round at the same share price could reflect the cooler funding environment over the past year, a period in which many startups have seen investors mark down the value of their shares. It also could reflect an effort by Snapchat to temper expectations while growing its nascent advertising business.

Snapchat

Snapchat expects revenue of $250 million to $300 million this year, more than four times as much as last year’s $60 million. The company has worked with publishers to add “disappearing” news articles and videos to its app and agreed deals with Viacom Inc. and ad tracker Nielsen to attract more advertising clients.

Why are investors pumping money into an app that generated less than $60m in revenue last year? To start with, Snapchat is extremely popular among young Americans. Having recently surpassed Instagram, it caters to a new generation of users for whom Facebook and Twitter are the social media channels preferred by Baby Boomers.

According to sources close to the company the number of people using Snapchat every day grew by around 50 percent in each quarter last year. By the end of 2015, Snapchat had 110 million daily active users who combined to generate an impressive 10 billion video views per day.

But don’t be misled into believing Snapchat is an app used primarily by teenagers to send each other racy pictures, Frederic Cumenal, CEO of Tiffany & Co, revealed that Tiffany has created a Snapchat “filter” which allows would-be purchasers to virtually “try on” Tiffany diamond rings, without ever having to visit a Tiffany stores. One of the reasons companies such as Tiffany are creating Snapchat filters is that they are keen to catch the cyber buzz — and appeal to Millennials.

The luxury sector is struggling at the moment, partly because of world economic fortunes but perhaps more importantly because the perception of luxury is changing. Indeed Tiffany has seen its share price tumble by almost one-third in the past year.

According to Sarah Quinlan, a MasterCard executive who analyzes spending data, there is a fundamental shift in terms of how wealthy and not-so-wealthy people are spending their money.

Although overall consumer spending is growing this growth is in upscale dining, hotels, travel and vacations. As a report by Deloitte consultants notes: “All consumers, but especially millennials, value experiences . . . spend by people travelling accounts for 40 per cent of the personal luxury markets.”

Today’s Millennials often live in cities, not suburbs as a result they have less physical space in which to store possessions, they value concepts such as “sustainability” and “community” which are in conflict with some luxury items such as vehicles. In the cyber age, luxury physical goods do not have the cachet they once had.

Experiences however remain exclusive, precisely because these cannot be commoditized and purchased online. One of the most powerful forms of conspicuous consumption today is not the accumulation of stuff but the curation of memories — and unique personal stories.

These changes do not signal the end of luxury goods what it does mean is that luxury goods companies are mixing experiences with goods to create prestigious occasions and precious memories. Whether it is exclusive music events or visiting your favorite distillery.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Consumer Behaviour, Cultural Differences, General, Social Media, Strategy | Tagged , | Comments Off on When Worlds Collide!

Twitter in Flux

Microblogging site Twitter is to stop counting photographs and links in its 140-character limit for tweets, according to a report from Bloomberg. This change could be made available within the next two weeks.Links currently take up to 23 characters of a tweet, reducing the space available to users for their own message when sharing online content via a link.

CIA

The 140-character limit was originally added to make tweets fit into a text message. When the company launched in 2006, before smartphones were available, many users typed their tweets as texts before posting them.Jack Dorsey the founder of Twitter has described the limit as a “beautiful constraint” that “inspires creativity and brevity”. However, the company has struggled to attract new users and has seen its share price decline by more than 70% over the past year.

GCHQ First Tweet May 16th 2016

Whether this change will help address the declining user engagementwe reported in April of this year remains to be seen.

Last June, Twitter announced it would increase the limit on direct messages between one user and another to 10,000 characters.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Public Relations, Social Media | Tagged | Comments Off on Twitter in Flux

PR and Public Health

The Flint water crisis is a drinking water contamination issue in Flint, Michigan, United States that started in April 2014. After Flint changed its water source from treated Detroit Water and Sewerage Department water to the Flint River its drinking water had a series of problems that culminating in lead contamination, creating a serious public health danger.

The corrosive Flint River water caused lead from aging pipes to leach into the water supply, causing extremely elevated levels of the heavy metal. In Flint, between 6,000 and 12,000 children have been exposed to drinking water with high levels of lead and they may experience a range of serious health problems.

With the long-term nature of lead poisoning and legal actions, the Flint water story will continue to unfold for years to come. What is clear is that this man-made disaster is a classic example of what not to do in public relations. The lessons will come at a terrible price for many people. The biggest price, by far, will be paid by the children now suffering from lead poisoning.

Public health and communication about public health issues are at the heart of this story. Recently released emails show early symptoms had been detected from the beginning. Nevertheless, these early warning signs of crisis were ignored. Government agents employed “subterfusion of innovation,” a concerted effort to suppress the free flow of information surrounding the new water source. Simply put, public officials were trying to talk their way out of a man-made problem.

As information emerged about lead contamination and Legionnaires’ disease, PR practitioners began distancing themselves from the governor. The governor’s own press secretary, Sara Wurfel, announced her resignation on Aug. 11, 2015, just as lead concerns were becoming known.

Flint has become shorthand for a bureaucratic catastrophe.

Public relations professionals have an ethical responsibility in all situations. However, where public health is concerned those same professionals have an even greater duty, which is to protect the population at large. There are clearly times when PR and Communication agencies have to provide advice and guidance that their clients do not want to hear. Flint illustrates

President Barack Obama said of the crisis, “What is inexplicable and inexcusable is once people figured out that there was a problem there, and that there was lead in the water, the notion that immediately families weren’t notified, things weren’t shut down. That shouldn’t happen anywhere.”

President Obama visited Flint on May 4, 2016 to reiterate his thoughts and drank a glass of filtered Flint water to show it’s now safe.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Media Relations, Public Relations | Tagged | Comments Off on PR and Public Health

Stock Market is Unforgiving

This week will be the last busy week of the Q1 earnings season, with results from more than 130 S&P 500 companies set to be filed. By the end of this week, results from 88% of S&P 500 members will have been released. With the possible exception of Retail the trends for most of the sectors are already well established. For Q1 as a whole, combining the actual results that have come out already with estimates for the still-to-come reports, total earnings are on track to be down -7.4% from the same period last year on -1% lower revenues,

Let’s focus on the high technology sector and look at the stock market reaction to the most recent earnings reports by some of the largest tech companies in the world, we see mixed results. While both Amazon and Facebook saw their stock prices climb significantly on the day after they reported their results, Twitter and Netflix faced negative reaction in the wake of reporting disappointing Q1 numbers or offering weak Q2 guidance.

The chart below sums up Wall Street’s verdict on major tech companies’ first quarter results.

Source: Statista,Yahoo Finance

Twitter in particular took a dive. On the back of 310million monthly active users, the company posted revenues of $595 million. On top of this, the company did not have a positive outlook for Q2, and currently Twitter’s stock is trading more than 13% down in the immediate aftermath of the results coming out.

Source Twitter

Twitter expects Q2 revenues between $590 million and $610 million, but this is a huge step down from $678 million, which is what analysts had estimated before today’s release. Twitter’s 310 million active users is not great user growth, although it is up slightly. This graphic illustrates all too clearly the lack of growth.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Stock Market is Unforgiving

Nike Founder Tells His Story

With an OOKII Company office in Portland, the home of Nike, it’s impossible not to take a deep interest in this fascinating story. In his memoir, Shoe Dog, which comes out tomorrow April 26th, 2016 Nike founder and CEO Phil Knight shares his inside story of the company’s early days as an intrepid start-up and its evolution into one of the world’s most iconic, game-changing, and profitable brands.

Phil Knight, Founder and CEO of NIKE. AP Photo/Rick Bowmer

Shoe Dog - out Apr 26 - A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

In 1962, fresh out of business school, Phil Knight borrowed $50 from his father and created a company with a simple mission: import high-quality, low-cost athletic shoes from Japan. Selling the shoes from the trunk of his lime green Plymouth Valiant, Knight grossed $8,000 his first year. Today, Nike’s annual sales top $30 billion. In an age of startups, Nike is the ne plus ultra of all startups, and the Swoosh has become a revolutionary, globe-spanning icon, one of the most ubiquitous and recognizable symbols in the world today.

The company was founded on January 25, 1964, as Blue Ribbon Sports, by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight, and officially became Nike, Inc. on May 30, 1971. The company takes its name from Nike, the Greek goddess of victory. Nike sponsors many high-profile athletes and sports teams around the world, with the highly recognized trademarks of “Just Do It” and the famous Swoosh logo.

But Knight, the man behind the Swoosh, has always remained a mystery. Now, for the first time, he tells his story, beginning with his crossroads moment. At 24, after backpacking around the world, he decided to take the unconventional path, to start his own business—a business that would be dynamic, different.

Knight details the many risks and daunting setbacks that stood between him and his dream—along with his early triumphs. Above all, he recalls the formative relationships with his first partners and employees, a ragtag group of misfits and seekers who became a tight-knit band of brothers. Together, harnessing the transcendent power of a shared mission, and a deep belief in the spirit of sport, together they built a brand that changed everything.  Visit the OOKII Company Facebook page and discover how you could win a copy of Shoe Dog.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in General, Media Relations, Promotion | Tagged | Comments Off on Nike Founder Tells His Story

VC Investments

There is never a shortage of new ideas and the entrepreneurs behind them, but the number who secure investment does vary. In the first quarter of 2016 it was particularly difficult for entrepreneurs. Fewer startups received first-time funding and those who did receive investment received smaller amounts.

According to MoneyTree™ report during the first three months of 2016, initial funding deals declined 16 percent to 297, and the total dollars invested fell 31 percent to $1.7 billion, according to the latest

The average amount for first-time financing dropped 17 percent from $6.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2015 to $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2016.

All that said it was still a strong first quarter for venture activity compared to recent years. We have seen several strong quarters of VC fundraising so we fully expect to see investors looking for interesting investment opportunities. Where will that money go? We believe the preference for Software and Biotech will continue.

Software companies received the highest level of funding, receiving just over $5 billion in 376 transactions, a 12 percent increase in value and a 5 percent decrease in deal volume compared to the fourth quarter of 2015.

Biotech companies received the second largest amount of funding, receiving almost $2 billion in 118 transactions, representing an 11 percent increase in value and a 19 percent increase in deal volume compared to the fourth quarter of 2015.

See the following chart for a comprehensive view of which sectors attract investment capital.

Investments by industry Q1 2016, Q4 2015, and Q1 2015       Source: MoneyTree(TM)

(MoneyTree™ report is produced by PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association, based on data from Thomson Reuters.)

More detailed results can be found at www.pwcmoneytree.com

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in General, Strategy, Technology | Comments Off on VC Investments

Millennials Value Reputation

Fast growth companies are always hungry for talent. Millennials are a prime component of the workforce and they will represent fully 40% of the total workforce by 2020, companies need to understand what motivates Millennials if they are to recruit and retain the talent they need to sustain growth.

According to Forbes 72% of Millennials would like to be their own boss. For most Millennials this means they can work when, where and how they like, providing they are achieving their goals. This desire is much more about lifestyle than work/life balance or work/life integration. If millennials like the idea of being their own boss, in an entrepreneurial sort of way, then it should be relatively straight forward for fast growth high tech companies to recruit them – right?

The answer is – perhaps. Because it turns out that reputation matters too. There are certain industries where some Millennials will not work, perhaps not surprisingly Oil and Gas is a sector that many Millennials would avoid, based solely on the negative image of that sector.

Millennials want their work to have a purpose, to contribute something to the world and they want to be proud of their employer. The brands that appeal to young people as consumers including those that stress their environmental and social record, are the same brands that appeal to them as employers.

Source: Statista

 

Bottom line your Employment Brand is critical.

Candidates evaluate company brands before applying for or accepting a job, much in the same way they evaluate consumer brands when shopping, Millennials will be researching you as much as you’re researching them. Clearly the company website is a strong tool for engaging talent but beyond that your whole online reputation is going to be under scrutiny. It doesn’t matter if you are B2C or B2B what candidates read and see about you online will have a strong influence on their opinion of you as an employer.

A smart PR agency will have the tools and expertise to stay abreast of what stakeholders are saying about your company on platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat. More importantly they can help you enter into a meaningful engagement that builds your reputation in a way that is truly authentic and helps attract the best talent.  While you focus on growing the business.

First published by Adrian G Stewart at OOKII.Company

Adrian G Stewart

Adrian G Stewart

Posted in Consumer Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Millennials Value Reputation